|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:01 pm
The issue with gun control is that people think they have the right to own the gun, they don't realized that right was granted with the responsibility to defend the country in war, times before organized military. Now that we have organized military we need to change the rules on gun ownership, because we no longer need to be able to remove the gun from its mount and fight to keep our rights as civilians.
On the idea of roleplay, I am not really sure how you intend to make it work.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:06 pm
cool4 The issue with gun control is that people think they have the right to own the gun, they don't realized that right was granted with the responsibility to defend the country in war, times before organized military. Now that we have organized military we need to change the rules on gun ownership, because we no longer need to be able to remove the gun from its mount and fight to keep our rights as civilians. On the idea of roleplay, I am not really sure how you intend to make it work. I think the idea is to destroy the increasingly-oppressive American government with the guns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:17 pm
RedroostersX2 cool4 The issue with gun control is that people think they have the right to own the gun, they don't realized that right was granted with the responsibility to defend the country in war, times before organized military. Now that we have organized military we need to change the rules on gun ownership, because we no longer need to be able to remove the gun from its mount and fight to keep our rights as civilians. On the idea of roleplay, I am not really sure how you intend to make it work. I think the idea is to destroy the increasingly-oppressive American government with the guns. My instincts say that wouldn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:00 pm
the premise that rights are granted is akin to saying free food is on sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:26 pm
cool4 RedroostersX2 cool4 The issue with gun control is that people think they have the right to own the gun, they don't realized that right was granted with the responsibility to defend the country in war, times before organized military. Now that we have organized military we need to change the rules on gun ownership, because we no longer need to be able to remove the gun from its mount and fight to keep our rights as civilians. On the idea of roleplay, I am not really sure how you intend to make it work. I think the idea is to destroy the increasingly-oppressive American government with the guns. My instincts say that wouldn't work. It depends on a lot of things. A whole lot of things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:27 pm
Michael Noire the premise that rights are granted is akin to saying free food is on sale. I remember being as smart as you once. I don't know what happened. Might've been the fluoride.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:31 pm
Lela XX Welcome all to my parlor. cool4 The issue with gun control is that people think they have the right to own the gun, they don't realized that right was granted with the responsibility to defend the country in war, times before organized military. Now that we have organized military we need to change the rules on gun ownership, because we no longer need to be able to remove the gun from its mount and fight to keep our rights as civilians. On the idea of roleplay, I am not really sure how you intend to make it work. RedroostersX2 I think the idea is to destroy the increasingly-oppressive American government with the guns. Quote: cool4: My instincts say that wouldn't work. Michael Noire the premise that rights are granted is akin to saying free food is on sale. Quote: RedroostersX2: It depends on a lot of things. A whole lot of things. Quote: Michael Noire: the premise that rights are granted is akin to saying free food is on sale. Quote: RedroostersX2: I remember being as smart as you once. I don't know what happened. Might've been the fluoride. I've never claimed to know anything about roleplaying online. I've only done it somewhat live, never before online. So I hope someone with experience online can guide us. But I can imagine how it might work. My guess is that we would need to decide which characters should be involved. There would need to be at least one character progun and one antigun. Then there might also need to be one who acts as arbitrator or something. If anyone has more interesting ideas for the necessary characters, feel free to speak up. Can I be a freedom fighter? I want to be one of those. It's been my lifelong dream, ever since I figured out that you could not only fight, but get freedom by doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:36 pm
Michael Noire the premise that rights are granted is akin to saying free food is on sale. Please expand on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:37 pm
Lela XX The issue of Gun Control was brought up. So lets' see if we can find win-win solutions for that issue. Do you agree that these are some of the main concerns? Some are opposed to gun ownership, because they're concerned that people with guns sometimes kill, injure, or rob others. Some are concerned about having the freedom to own guns for self-defense.
Some are concerned that if they can't use guns, they won't be able to make as good a living from threatening others.If you know of other concerns on this issue, feel free to mention it or them. After the main concerns seem to be listed, then we'll try to think of solutions that may satisfy all of those concerns. Actually, I think we're going to try to do a roleplay situation first. If so, we need to decide who will play which character. I guess I'm willing to take any of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:47 pm
I feel the issue of gun ownership is one that will continue to be a relevant issue in U.S. politics. Whether or not it will be spoken of as it is now will likely depend on the volume of high profile issues that occur with a direct relation to it (hopefully few). On the issue of compromise, I feel that perhaps creating creating regulations for the sale and acquisition of would be more appealing than greater firearm restriction (or doing nothing).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
