|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:30 pm
as an FMA fan, i hear alot about how much Harry Potter is better or worse it is than FMA. personaly, i think Harry Potter lost it's point around the 2nd book. i mean, last thing we need is another idiot running around with a magic stick..... but, i digress.....
anyway, i want to know what you think about this conflict.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 1:20 pm
chimera_alchemist as an FMA fan, i hear alot about how much Harry Potter is better or worse it is than FMA. personaly, i think Harry Potter lost it's point around the 2nd book. i mean, last thing we need is another idiot running around with a magic stick..... but, i digress..... anyway, i want to know what you think about this conflict. what well *thinks hard* i can`t really picture that but no douht ed would win ha---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 2:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2006 3:34 pm
I love FMA, but Harry Potter is ok. I get your point it can be a bit pointless. And FMA is WAY COOLER, it's also sadder. In this debate I'm afraid that I must go with FMA.
Something I noticed is that it will end up being a one-sided debate, because this is an FMA guild we will most likely go for FMA. I doubt anyone will vote for Harry Potter. *suspicious*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 2:55 pm
no contest FMA and every one here knows it thats why this is called the FMA guild
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 10:09 am
I like Harry Potter. But, if we were talking duel, I don't know. Since Ed doesn't need a transmutation spell...and Harry just needs to point and speak it could be a duel. The leg locker curse could definately make it impossible for Ed to do alchemy. Though, I would have to say Potter's a p***y when it comes to blood...so Ed would win hands down. Very interesting question though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 4:04 pm
harry potter vr full metal alchemist yeah riht full metal will win of course eek blaugh 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:31 pm
ninja_of_ war as an FMA fan, i hear alot about how much Harry Potter is better or worse it is than FMA. personaly, i think Harry Potter lost it's point around the 2nd book. i mean, last thing we need is another idiot running around with a magic stick..... but, i digress..... anyway, i want to know what you think about this conflict. ditto. I think ed would win that one... blades and metal arms over a magical stick any day biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:37 am
all ed's got to do is break harry's pathetic little stick of a wand and he wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:44 pm
In my opinion, I would say that full metal alchemist is better. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:02 am
harry potter lost its meaning in the first book i read it 3 times and i still dont get wut its about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:06 am
harry potter its ok but i rather watch paint dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:28 am
I am going to be the odd ball, and say that I love harry Potter alot more than I do FMA. I think that both are very interesting, but for some reason, I can grasp Harry Potter a bit better than I can FMA. I still Love FMA, but Harry Potter is a bit more interesting to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:09 am
that does make you the odd ball now doesn't it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:24 am
Full Metal Alchemist is better then Harry Potter in my opinion. ninja But I don't think it should be compared... Full Metal Alchemist is a great anime series and Harry Potter is a good movie. I think they are both good but I rather watch FMA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
