Welcome to Gaia! ::

SOrry to make this every one who is anti bush. but i'm sorry of listening to all the children at school rant and rave about how bush is a killer and should be dragged off to the UN and tried for War crimes. I mean YESH. it's hard in my school to be a bush supporter since i am surrounded by fake 'punk' peoiple who are anti bush anti goverment anti life basicly. George W. Bush in my opinon is one of the presidents that this country could not have gone on with out (well we could but would have taken HELLA long time wiht al gore as president.) turn your attention to 9-11 he acted EXACTLY as a president should when a terrorist group attacks OUR country OUR city OUR lives. If you have watched that pecie of crap movie farhenhight (sorry on spelling) 9-11 you can see how the media can manipulate ANY situation to a bad situation. don't belive me? go see the new movie paparotzi (sorry spelling) that is a PERFECT example on how the media can COMPLETLY destroy a mans life. so please do not belive all you see on the T.V. and what ya read on the net. if ya want i can give some relaible internet news sights to get good information on basicly any subject ya want. ANYWAYS, BUsh why would you not like him? "he created a reason to go to Iraq and finish what his father started." BS you try and tell me they found nothing in the deserts. they found 3 migs barried in the sand (in metal cantainers) with DE activated nuculear torpedos on them it dind't make the news for 2 reasons. the nukes where missing thier nuclear tips and 2 because it wouldn't look good that they where wrong about bush going thier for no reason. i beilve he went to Iraq becasue we needed to free those supressed people. I sat and listend to this girl complain about the republic convention and my first thought was. "then why did you watch it? you have 500 chanels why not watch one of those. i know some out there like me don't have 500 channels more like 10. turn the T.V. off and read a bush basher book. ( razz ) sorry again to yall about ranting and hte spelling but it ahs gone on to much.

Amen.

Yeah, I am seriously itching to find an actual reason why Kerry should be elected, rather then why Bush shouldn't be. I mean seriously. I want to know why they made him their candidate at all.

Also, why don't the Anti-Bush people all agree to vote for a specific third party, huh? I mean, instead of these stupid threads on "A vote for a third party is a vote for Bush". It's really kinda annoying how our country is made in such a way that it -is- possible, even though currently unlikely, for a third party to win, and yet no one will vote for them for fear of it being a wasted vote. If the people who thought that way all decided "WTF, I'll vote for them anyway" I think we'd see a huge difference in the percentages.

I support Bush. I may not agree with a lot of what he has done, but for one he is the only pro-life candidate to choose from. For another I can at least trust what he's going to do. He does what he says he's going to do. He told Sadam that if he didn't comply with the UN we'd attack. Sadam didn't, and we did attack. I don't think Bush really wanted to go to war, but I think he would have looked like a much weaker leader if he hadn't stuck to what he said, and Iraq would have gotten the idea that he could push a little bit farther without getting in trouble for it... (and if anyone remembers this is kind of what happened with Germany and WW-II... Everyone was like, "OK, we don't like what you just did, but we'll let you get away with it this time if you promise to do better next time... sweatdrop Wonder why France has neglected to remember that little detail)

Iraq is like a moose you give him a cookie he'll wnat a glass of milk. you give him a glass of milk he'll want another cookie. and you end up letting him do and take what ever they wnat just to avoid conflict, and yeah well france lost ALOT of respect some where in time. htey where once strong enough to compeete with britian now they are nothing. and thats pretty sad. oh i heard somethign funny the other day. a guy brought up that the UN could send troops ont american soil with out permission to take bush and arrest him to have him tiralied. and i simply siad. "they could try and take him... but good look your gonna have about a million pissed off americans wnating to know why uo came onto our land wiht out permission ot take one of our leaders." and besides that the UN "troops" are jsut parts of the diffrent armies of the countrys that belong to the UN and you really think that would be a threat? HA! sure we don't ahve much millitary here but we still have our rights to bare amrs and the right to arm bears! and i would plan to practice that right if they tried that.

Ha! I'm glad to hear that we have the Amish on our side. xd As for the US not having much along the lines of military, we're one of the superpowers right now! Now, if it were up to the Democratic Party, they would severely cut back on the armed forces, but Republicans believe in big military (but not using them unless we must). Thank goodness for the Constitution and the right to bear arms though. I don't own a gun myself, but I'm glad to know that I could if I needed to.

kerry wnats to run a more sensative war on terror.... lord only KNOWS what that means, lol. nad when i said we odn't have much military i meant we don't have much still inside the contiental USA, most are over seas. BUT i think thats awsome. i found something else out thats interesting. you all know Taiwan correct? (lil island where every thing you where comes form beasicly) welll when the REEAL republicans and democrats of china lost thier war. they fled to the lil island of Taiwan. China is held at bay from over running Taiwan because the USA has stationed off shore of Taiwan about 25% of our toptal naval forces. course this doesn;t stop china from doing "military exercises" above the island to try nad scare us into shooting them. we just do a shelling test the next day. into water of course... along thier coast line. but i find it amazeing we have been protecting taiwan for a long... LONG... LONG time. biggrin sorry just some info thought yall would like.

I must say that for a while, I honestly didn't want to vote for either Kerry OR Bush. Finally, after the Republican convention, I realized that I would much rather have a president who may have made quite a few mistakes but has also come through for Americans many times, rather than a candidate who's campaign promise seems to be nothing better than "At least he's not Bush". Even though Bush isn't my first choice for a candidate, I'll vote for him, since I agree with him on the things that are most important to me.

That's partly how I started out. I really didn't like Bush at all back in 2000. However, there's no way I could ever vote for Kerry. For one I don't agree with him, and secondly I would never trust him as a leader. He hasn't proven in any way that he's actually capable of doing what's right for this country. I know I can at least trust Bush to do what he says, or at least try to the best of his ability to do so. I think that's one of the most important qualities in a leader, that they'll stand by what they said and back it up with action. Whether he actually succeeds (another question for another day), Bush does I think have America's best interests in mind and that he is trying to do what he thinks is right. I can't say that about Kerry.