|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:47 am
 Have we any preferences as regards a logo?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:12 pm
Either the top or bottom left. Doesn't really make a difference which, I like them both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:49 pm
i prefer the number 5.................... 4laugh ninja 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:22 pm
Ok, so do we prefer black or blue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:06 pm
blue blue blue, black is far toooooooo dark for such a good cause as this guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:17 pm
I like numbers four and five, maybe number one too.
Also, quite a few people in my Guild have said it might look better as "U.N.G." rathe than "UNG", I agree, but do you too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:16 pm
I prefer black. ):
And I'm so used to seeing guilds with three-letter initials without the periods, that with them, it looks a bit strange. So I'd say without them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:00 pm
1) You should make a poll for the design, then; 2) Make another poll for the color preference. Personally I'd use blue and/or green for the logo. #6 is my choice. Maybe have the leaves and UNG in green with the blue circle? I also think that UNG would look better at the top of the image rather than below it. It looks detatched down there, whereas on top it would be more a part of the image. Just some thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:57 am
I'd go for number four or number one, and I agree that when the letters are below the image, they look a bit detached from it. I'd like to see a version with the letters on top. smile No colour preferences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:26 pm
 It's just a quick edit of your logos but I'd prefer something like this...
Here's what I changed:
I kind of reversed the globe.
I'd like it if the lines were green/blue/whatever instead of white.
I placed the letters above the image instead of leaving them below it.
I also increased the size of the letters. Maybe I made them a little too big
though...not sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:15 pm
Well, if people agree with you and you can make an equivalent image to each of the ones we have now, then I don't see why not. I just hope you can reach the same level of definition as the logos we've had made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:47 pm
Invictus_88 Well, if people agree with you and you can make an equivalent image to each of the ones we have now, then I don't see why not. I just hope you can reach the same level of definition as the logos we've had made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:10 pm
Arle It's just a quick edit of your logos but I'd prefer something like this...
Here's what I changed:
I kind of reversed the globe.
I'd like it if the lines were green/blue/whatever instead of white.
I placed the letters above the image instead of leaving them below it.
I also increased the size of the letters. Maybe I made them a little too big
though...not sure.
I quite like this logo. 3nodding #4 wasn't bad, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:52 pm
Arle It's just a quick edit of your logos but I'd prefer something like this...
Here's what I changed:
I kind of reversed the globe.
I'd like it if the lines were green/blue/whatever instead of white.
I placed the letters above the image instead of leaving them below it.
I also increased the size of the letters. Maybe I made them a little too big
though...not sure.
Either this one or the one on the bottom left. Both of 'em are pretty shnazzy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
