|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 10:13 am
If you, for some god-only-knows reason decided to put yoghurt in tea, (or indeed tea into yoghurt), what would the outcome be? Yoghurt flavoured tea or tea-flavoured yoghurt? Let us debate this ancient discussion from the depths of the GBG... 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Nebelstern what would the outcome be? Disgusting.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:01 pm
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasty
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:58 pm
It's making me think of Mrs. Doubtfire when he has the cake on his face and parts of it fall into that womans tea...
gross...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 3:08 pm
Can we not just have the yoghurt flavoured yoghurt and tea flavoured tea in seperate containers, eaten at the same time. Or drunk.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 5:24 pm
I'd say it depends on which ingredient goes in first...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 2:51 am
Nah, I prefer yoghurt in its purest form.
however, a sweet lemon tea sorbet might actually work..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 4:11 am
Invictus_88 Nah, I prefer yoghurt in its purest form.
however, a sweet lemon tea sorbet might actually work.. Well, let's just assume the yoghurt is tea-flavoured due to the fact that tea has been poured into it. Or the other way around. Then it becomes rather like the glass half-full or half-empty analogy. Yoghurty-tea or tea-flavoured yoghurt. It can identify your yoghurty preference. wink
And yes, it does rather remind me of that Mrs. Doubtfire bit as well. Except that was CREAM tea, not yoghurty tea. Like it matters anyway...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 4:58 am
I'd say it depends on the ration, and all things being equal; I would say yoghurty-tea.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 8:20 am
Well, basically, you get tea with lumps of yoghurt in. However, if one were to be quite gastronomically deviant enough to combine the two in some sort of a blender, the resulting combination would be probably too foul to even entertain the thought of naming.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 8:29 am
You are ALL missing the point of the metaphorical depth it all implies!!
Gah, never mind... sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 9:29 am
Nebelstern You are ALL missing the point of the metaphorical depth it all implies!!
Gah, never mind... sweatdrop No, I know what you mean. It's just another one of these things which, even if people DID understand what you meant, would just be debated for five posts and then go horrible off topic. So why not just cut out the middle man and go off topic?!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 9:57 am
Gaulia Nebelstern You are ALL missing the point of the metaphorical depth it all implies!!
Gah, never mind... sweatdrop No, I know what you mean. It's just another one of these things which, even if people DID understand what you meant, would just be debated for five posts and then go horrible off topic. So why not just cut out the middle man and go off topic?! Yes indeedy. Very true and well observed. What could we talk about then?I suppose the 'ol white text should kick in an appearance right about now as well...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:01 am
Nebelstern Gaulia Nebelstern You are ALL missing the point of the metaphorical depth it all implies!!
Gah, never mind... sweatdrop No, I know what you mean. It's just another one of these things which, even if people DID understand what you meant, would just be debated for five posts and then go horrible off topic. So why not just cut out the middle man and go off topic?! Yes indeedy. Very true and well observed. What could we talk about then?I suppose the 'ol white text should kick in an appearance right about now as well...Spatulas. Is that the correct plural of spatula? Spatular? Damnit.. Why of course! I nearly forgot about the white text..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:09 am
Gaulia Nebelstern Gaulia Nebelstern You are ALL missing the point of the metaphorical depth it all implies!!
Gah, never mind... sweatdrop No, I know what you mean. It's just another one of these things which, even if people DID understand what you meant, would just be debated for five posts and then go horrible off topic. So why not just cut out the middle man and go off topic?! Yes indeedy. Very true and well observed. What could we talk about then?I suppose the 'ol white text should kick in an appearance right about now as well...Spatulas. Is that the correct plural of spatula? Spatular? Damnit.. Why of course! I nearly forgot about the white text.. Spatuli? I thought it was spatulas... sweatdrop Spatulas?!? That was the best you could do?!?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|