|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:07 pm
Today we mourn the passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who has been with us for many years. No one knows for sure how old he was since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape.
He will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as knowing when to come in out of the rain, why the early bird gets the worm, life isn't always fair, and maybe it was my fault.
Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don't spend more than you earn) and reliable parenting strategies (adults, not children, are in charge).
His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well intentioned but overbearing regulations were set in place. Reports of a six-year- old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a classmate; teens suspended from school for using mouthwash after lunch; and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student, only worsened his condition.
Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job they themselves failed to do in disciplining their unruly children.
It declined even further when schools were required to get parental consent to administer Panadol, sun lotion or a Band Aid to a student - but could not inform the parents when a student became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion.
Common Sense lost the will to live as the Ten Commandments became contraband, churches became businesses, and criminals received better treatment than their victims.
Common Sense took a beating when you couldn't defend yourself from a burglar in your own home and the burglar can sue you for assault.
Common Sense finally gave up the will to live after a woman failed to realize that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She spilled a little in her lap, and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.
Common Sense was preceded in death by his parents, Truth and Trust; his wife, Discretion; his daughter, Responsibility; and his son, Reason.
He is survived by three stepbrothers; I Know My Rights, Someone Else is to Blame, and I'm A Victim. Not many attended his funeral because so few realized he was gone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:08 pm
Somehow, I think common sense really is long gone. I see so very little of it these days. Why else would so little be governed by reason, instead of by desire and thirst for money?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:34 pm
You forgot the man you put his RV on "auto drive" and went into the back to make himself a cup of coffee.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:03 pm
Well, I didn't write this, but I do agree with a lot of what this is talking about.
Man. That guy messed that up. Probably didn't even get to finish his coffee. lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:43 pm
Common sense isn't dead. It's just that people in power fail to use it once they get that lust for more power. Old people will always whine and complain about how the present has gone to hell, just as their elders did when they were young (there was some writing either in Greek or Latin (ancient times) that said how horrible the world has gotten. See? never changes) And people are morons every day. That's how it's always been, nothing's ever gotten worse, but neither has it gotten better.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:04 pm
The saddest part of this thread is the fact that it absolutely oozing with truth. Human beings have lost their way, our wisdom takes a -4 penalty.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:26 pm
"common sense" was, i believe, an invention of the enlightenment.
the supposition was that all humans were endowed by their creator with: a basic common understanding of how life worked.
but maybe that premise was just wrong.
maybe it was too culturaly narrow.
moslems, jews, and christians have as part of their worldview a sense of linear history, movement from one point to another. even if we are no longer so infatuated with ideals of "prgress" or "destiny", the rooted sense of having been brought into being at some specific time, and being aimed at some eventual set time of ending, has defined the world view of the west.
but it does not define the hindu view, which is cyclical and embraces all of time and space. in fact it has been suggested that hindu philosophy is more suited for dialogue with quantum physics than are other traditions, because it has this sense of flux within a field.
perhaps this is also true for buddhism?
it does seem that other oriental traditions such as Taoism and Shinto do not have a deep concern for linear moivement in history.
and that is just one example, of how our "common sense" may be culturally limited.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:10 am
The cyclic nature of the universe is an attribute of both Buddhism and Taoism. Minor point: shintoism in its original form is very rare today, save to cultural historians. Most of what you'll find is nationalistic shintoism, a mixture of Shinto and Buddhism, "officially" created in the mid-1800s as part of a growing sense of nationalism in Japan. In the early 1900s, it was made the official religion of Japan, as Japan entered the wars of the 20th century. While WWII disbanded Japan's nationalistic feelings, this is the form of Shinto that persisted.
But, getting back to the point...Buddhism also embraces the cyclic nature of the universe (being born out of Hinduism). The distinct approach that Buddhism takes to life - nonduality - is more suited for modern science and philosophy than Western religions ever were. While each new scientific development seems to come into conflict with the original creation passages of the Western holy texts, it never (or very rarely) comes into conflict with Buddhist or Hindu texts. In fact, as Western colonies started to spread to the East, philosophers started looking more and more at the nondualistic philosophies of these religions, focusing on Zen/Chan specifically. This school is also one of the best philosophical introductions to quantum physics, because of that nondualistic nature.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|