|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:59 am
Do you think that BFM should be banned from the game?  So i have heard this was a real creature please have a nice comment if you are going to comment
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:34 pm
I thought that card was already banned. Anyways That's one of my favorite monsters. Would be better if it had trample though stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:40 pm
No I don't think he should be banned and i also dont think he should have trample either (nasty)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:53 pm
Unglued and Unhinged cards aren't legal in any format that I know of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:21 pm
Masumaro Unglued and Unhinged cards aren't legal in any format that I know of. Except for if you have a tournament with them alone. We had a 'Prerelease' for Unhinged. It was Awesome!! Imagine playing sealed with these cards! I don't think BFM should be banned, there's too much that can deal with it. A card is only banned if it's deemed to be too overpowered unto itself. A Faith's Fetters on this dude and all is well in the universe again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:05 pm
I would love to play an un-set tourney. I remember back when Unglued came out, those were good times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:37 pm
[-The Ingram-] I would love to play an un-set tourney. I remember back when Unglued came out, those were good times. We may have an 'Un-Tourney' coming up soon in this guild... xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:16 am
DeckMaster here answering all of your questions once more because my knowledge is your power.
first of all the BFM(big furry monster) is a real creature.. it was created in the unglued set. unglued was a set that was just making fun of magic. it was a cool set. and originally it is actually 2 cards. a left side and a right side. (i have 2 left sides and 1 right side but I'm willing to trade my other left side for another right side so i can give it to my cousin)
sense the BFM was such a big creature, it was put on 2 cards.. and in order for you to play the creature you must have both in hand at the same time. as well as if one side is destroyed the other side is destroyed as well.
it was originally making fun of the weapon from the game doom called th "BFG(big fu**in gun) for its massive power and ability to turn anything into dust. also if you notice there is a polar kraken and a phyrixaien Dreadnought on its ears its using as earrings. those where the biggest creatures of the time the BFM was created . just to simulate how massively huge this creature is.
the BFM and the unglued and unhinged sets are both banned from all forms of play except for casual (the unique lands in the set can also be used in any form of play)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dark Neo Vamp Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:33 am
I like the card but if you can only have 4 of any creature in your deck does that mean you could have 4 of each side in a deck?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:03 am
Yes, as you need both halves in order to play it.
I loved the unglued and unhinged sets. I found the unusual cards hilarious.
I'm also the only person where I live that abuses gleemax by not putting it into play. haha. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:38 am
so what you are saying is that the bfm A.kA big ******** monster left side cost s**t neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:45 am
fieldy23 so what you are saying is that the bfm A.kA big ******** monster left side cost s**t neutral please use periods it's hard to understand you with no form of punctuation to play the left side you must play the right side at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:30 pm
You need both cards in hand in order to put it into play. You cannot play one half without the other.
So to play Big Furry Monster costs 15 black mana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:04 am
dark_neo_vamp I like the card but if you can only have 4 of any creature in your deck does that mean you could have 4 of each side in a deck? thats wha t i was wondering.. if the 2 halfs count as 2 cards.. or one card.. so can you have 4 copys of each half or only 2 copys of each half in a deck.. i have asked this one numerus times to many judges and so far i have came up with zltch.. i think im going to go to the website and post that question to answer that one once and for all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:08 am
fieldy23 so what you are saying is that the bfm A.kA big ******** monster left side cost s**t neutral doesnt anyone read my words of wisdom! gonk hell im the enclopedia of magic! and noboy ever reads my posts becuse everyone thinks im blowing hot air! geez people! read my posts! they will let you understand everything becuse i can answer nearley allo f your questions (im going to take the judge test later on when i get settled in to my new place)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[-The Ingram-]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/e9/cc/315bb19128cce9_flip.png?t=1250962239_6.00_11)
