|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:59 pm
Hello.
Well, I think I might as well do something in here people, as
I funded this thing. xD
I'd hate to see that gold go to waste when it could go toward
improving this avi.
I will take on anyone in the Guild on any subject, and I can, in
most cases, take either side.
In other words; I am very flexible.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:07 pm
Malachi89 Hello. Well, I think I might as well do something in here people, as I funded this thing. xD I'd hate to see that gold go to waste when it could go toward improving this avi. I will take on anyone in the Guild on any subject, and I can, in most cases, take either side. In other words; I am very flexible. Can you do same-sex marriage as opposing? I don't get to see a real arguement against same-sex marriage often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:43 pm
foxpaws Malachi89 Hello. Well, I think I might as well do something in here people, as I funded this thing. xD I'd hate to see that gold go to waste when it could go toward improving this avi. I will take on anyone in the Guild on any subject, and I can, in most cases, take either side. In other words; I am very flexible. Can you do same-sex marriage as opposing? I don't get to see a real arguement against same-sex marriage often. Hoo.... my weakness. But, it sounds like a challenge. I will be willing to do it as soon as we get judges and so on. Just not now; I am too tired to put up a fight against something I believe whole-heartedly in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:50 pm
Malachi89 foxpaws Malachi89 Hello. Well, I think I might as well do something in here people, as I funded this thing. xD I'd hate to see that gold go to waste when it could go toward improving this avi. I will take on anyone in the Guild on any subject, and I can, in most cases, take either side. In other words; I am very flexible. Can you do same-sex marriage as opposing? I don't get to see a real arguement against same-sex marriage often. Hoo.... my weakness. But, it sounds like a challenge. I will be willing to do it as soon as we get judges and so on. Just not now; I am too tired to put up a fight against something I believe whole-heartedly in. I know what you're talking about. In my debate class I was chosen to go against same-sex marriages, and I'm gay. So it was like taking a chunck out of my heart whenever I rebuttled. I lost, but it felt good trying. Whenever you're ready, just PM me for a time and date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:08 am
Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:00 am
RMarques Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding OK, so we have a pro-gay marriage judge. Now we need someone to judge the other side. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:20 am
Malachi RMarques Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding OK, so we have a pro-gay marriage judge. Now we need someone to judge the other side. xD The referee's job is to point of fallacies, incorrect information, etc., isn't it? The anti-gay marriage referee would have his/her hands full, since 99.9% of arguments are based on something like that. xd I wish we could find someone who was truly anti-gay marriage, but I don't think that's going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:54 am
Pandora Box Malachi RMarques Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding OK, so we have a pro-gay marriage judge. Now we need someone to judge the other side. xD The referee's job is to point of fallacies, incorrect information, etc., isn't it? The anti-gay marriage referee would have his/her hands full, since 99.9% of arguments are based on something like that. xd I wish we could find someone who was truly anti-gay marriage, but I don't think that's going to happen. I use to know a guy named D.S.K. who was anti-gay, but saddly he hasn't been on in months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:03 pm
Pandora Box Malachi RMarques Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding OK, so we have a pro-gay marriage judge. Now we need someone to judge the other side. xD The referee's job is to point of fallacies, incorrect information, etc., isn't it? The anti-gay marriage referee would have his/her hands full, since 99.9% of arguments are based on something like that. xd I wish we could find someone who was truly anti-gay marriage, but I don't think that's going to happen. We really need a stanch conservative in this guild gonk 90% of us are leaning liberals if not libertarians or socialists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:26 pm
My Conscience We really need a stanch conservative in this guild gonk 90% of us are leaning liberals if not libertarians or socialists. ED is really liberal anyway. I remember when it was a lot more conservative. Now the only hardcore (modern) conservatives are people like Amora-Bunny. I think Omnileech Mitoguard is conservative, actually, but he's more traditional so we'd probably still agree on some things. edited because I meant Mitoguard =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Pandora Box My Conscience We really need a stanch conservative in this guild gonk 90% of us are leaning liberals if not libertarians or socialists. ED is really liberal anyway. I remember when it was a lot more conservative. Now the only hardcore (modern) conservatives are people like Amora-Bunny. I think Omnileech is conservative, actually, but he's more traditional so we'd probably still agree on some things. True. I hate to bash them but the reason they are scarce is because logic works agains them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:43 pm
foxpaws Pandora Box Malachi RMarques Well if you're going to debate same sex marriage, I could judge the pro side 3nodding OK, so we have a pro-gay marriage judge. Now we need someone to judge the other side. xD The referee's job is to point of fallacies, incorrect information, etc., isn't it? The anti-gay marriage referee would have his/her hands full, since 99.9% of arguments are based on something like that. xd I wish we could find someone who was truly anti-gay marriage, but I don't think that's going to happen. I use to know a guy named D.S.K. who was anti-gay, but saddly he hasn't been on in months. Alas, one of the few times that's actually a bad thing xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:43 pm
I guess if we can't find another referee and all that we might hafta do something a bit diferent this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:01 pm
Malachi I guess if we can't find another referee and all that we might hafta do something a bit diferent this time. We can just use one, and then they'll check both. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 5:22 pm
foxpaws Malachi I guess if we can't find another referee and all that we might hafta do something a bit diferent this time. We can just use one, and then they'll check both. 3nodding Well, I am ready. Ish. I have at least 3 hours to myself (Except for 40 minutes in there I will need to shower) so PM me when everyone is ready.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
