|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:08 am
Since we really don't have any actual politically charged debate going on here...I'm going to do something potentially crippling, by Gaian standards: I'm about to draw from an AIM conversation.
AoSCDizzle667 (1:26:15 AM): Oh, it's 1:25 here. I meant yesterday. At the commencement of the cycle of waking that I am now taking part at. AoSCDizzle667 (1:26:26 AM): ...and I am now wishing I hadn't finished off the fifth last night. Shimbozy (1:28:16 AM): while its not worth it to judge you with the rediculous set of hypocritical and ultimately worthless set of values and preconceptions about behavior that society has set out for us, sometimes i wonder what we would be without them, what would we have to deviate from, what would we have to shun, become frustrated and tired with... AoSCDizzle667 (1:28:49 AM): We would have nothing. Or anarchy. They become one and the same. Shimbozy (1:29:11 AM): sometimes i wonder about that as well AoSCDizzle667 (1:29:38 AM): We have to have societal construct, or our rebellion would mean nothing. AoSCDizzle667 (1:29:56 AM): You can never have true utopia, but never can true anarchy exist either. Shimbozy (1:30:03 AM): what if it was possible to have some kind of utopian society where people were accountable for our own actions and everyone were to act in a harmonious fashion Shimbozy (1:30:10 AM): well i've thought about it Shimbozy (1:30:19 AM): the larger a group, a society is, the worse it is AoSCDizzle667 (1:30:45 AM): Of course. I've done some calculations, and democracy in its purest form can only properly exist in populations of 3000 or less. Shimbozy (1:30:58 AM): when a community is small, everyone knows everyone, we are all held individually accountable for our actions, our fear of rejection from our group can check our behavior Shimbozy (1:31:25 AM): the anonymity of a large system is what lets us become the monsters that we are AoSCDizzle667 (1:31:23 AM): And I honestly believe that a communist/socialist society of less than a hundred could exist, if raised from birth without human notions. Shimbozy (1:31:48 AM): its all about competition for resources Shimbozy (1:31:50 AM): its animal Shimbozy (1:31:59 AM): capitalism is the only real way Shimbozy (1:32:02 AM): but it has to be small Shimbozy (1:32:14 AM): its impossible for humans to be good when there is so many of them AoSCDizzle667 (1:32:42 AM): I find myself backing fascism more and more every day. Only by equalizing everyone but a few can the needs for the majorities and minorities be met properly. Shimbozy (1:33:14 AM): well Shimbozy (1:33:21 AM): im not sure what exactly you mean by that Shimbozy (1:33:42 AM): well on top of that Shimbozy (1:34:25 AM): i feel pretentious for speaking/writing as if i were some revolutionary with the absolutely correct ideas about society and economics Shimbozy (1:34:33 AM): or socio-economics Shimbozy (1:34:35 AM): heh AoSCDizzle667 (1:34:34 AM): Same thing. AoSCDizzle667 (1:34:58 AM): And I learned that elitism was part of the price. I know I'm no saint, and so does everyone else. I hope. Shimbozy (1:35:10 AM): hah AoSCDizzle667 (1:35:47 AM): I figure as long as I keep my head on the ground to a certain extent, I'll have no problems, in the long run, with supporting a political philosophy that I find attractive and effective. Shimbozy (1:36:04 AM): yeah AoSCDizzle667 (1:36:40 AM): At this point, I should mention that I'm actually considering going into politics, and I have a $10 bet with my mother that I will be elected President of the United States in 2024. Shimbozy (1:36:57 AM): well good luck on that my friend Shimbozy (1:37:13 AM): however i just want to remind you of a few beautiful things about our system Shimbozy (1:37:20 AM): 1 Shimbozy (1:37:24 AM): money is everything Shimbozy (1:37:26 AM): 2 Shimbozy (1:37:30 AM): who you know Shimbozy (1:37:32 AM): is everything Shimbozy (1:38:01 AM): if you cant work out some very effective and far reaching combination of the two you can do very little politically AoSCDizzle667 (1:38:25 AM): Yes, but I have the next seventeen years to build my reputation, using my primary resource, and the source of my rising fame: the Internet. Shimbozy (1:38:46 AM): if you can do that, more power to you AoSCDizzle667 (1:38:44 AM): Money can be gained when the time is right, my name shall spread for now. Shimbozy (1:38:56 AM): it would be nice to see things shaken up AoSCDizzle667 (1:39:04 AM): I seem to have somewhat of a charisma as of late. AoSCDizzle667 (1:39:18 AM): I'm easy to remember, and I get talked about. Shimbozy (1:39:45 AM): because all i see in the government is a juggernaut of greed corruption, money, racism, prejudice, and nepotism AoSCDizzle667 (1:39:46 AM): Right now, it's solely Gaian in nature, but that's because that's the only place I go other than webcomics. AoSCDizzle667 (1:39:49 AM): That'll end. Shimbozy (1:39:58 AM): and i mean every facet of government Shimbozy (1:40:01 AM): oh it has to AoSCDizzle667 (1:39:58 AM): If I get elected, that will end. Shimbozy (1:40:06 AM): haha Shimbozy (1:40:09 AM): reguardless Shimbozy (1:40:13 AM): it will all end AoSCDizzle667 (1:40:17 AM): I have a best-case scenario for my election, and a likely scenario should I get elected. Shimbozy (1:40:41 AM): well s**t Shimbozy (1:40:55 AM): if you need a secretary of funny s**t to say i'd love that job Shimbozy (1:41:00 AM): im majoring in english AoSCDizzle667 (1:40:57 AM): You got it. Shimbozy (1:41:08 AM): i at least have some BS credentials Shimbozy (1:41:53 AM): also i want to point out reguardless of wether or not you actually reach office, if little can actually be done in 4 or 8 years as the system we have currently exists Shimbozy (1:42:13 AM): look at it now Shimbozy (1:42:50 AM): the system is designed specifically where if they want it badly enough, absolutely nothing can be accomplished Shimbozy (1:43:22 AM): "checks and balances" they call it AoSCDizzle667 (1:43:31 AM): Of course it is. It has to be, in order to keep the country from effectively restarting from scratch every term. AoSCDizzle667 (1:43:33 AM): Best-case: I get assassinated early into my term, resurrecting after three days, and becoming an undying god, finally crossing the dimensional plane in search of somewhere better, placing either a resurrected Johnny Cash, or some suitable replacement, on the throne before I leave. Shimbozy (1:44:18 AM): thats comical in its absurdity, but please go on AoSCDizzle667 (1:44:51 AM): Likely (actually merely hopeful in its realism): I revolutionize political thought, reinstate the death penalty, and actually adhere to campaign promises, thus ensuring my second term, and from there attempt to rebuild the failing United States government. Shimbozy (1:45:30 AM): i dont know if any of that can be done Shimbozy (1:45:39 AM): but good luck trying Shimbozy (1:45:51 AM): its reassuring to know that people still care AoSCDizzle667 (1:46:05 AM): I'd actually be more inclined to say that it's frightening that it's me. Shimbozy (1:46:17 AM): about trying to do something to improve the world AoSCDizzle667 (1:46:15 AM): I actually see assassination likely for me. Shimbozy (1:46:28 AM): interesting Shimbozy (1:46:34 AM): i wonder why you feel that way AoSCDizzle667 (1:47:18 AM): Because every time a political thinker emerges, someone with the thoughts, and the chance to actually do something about it, they get killed. AoSCDizzle667 (1:47:44 AM): JFK, Gandhi, Malcolm X, King, RFK...especially RFK. Shimbozy (1:48:10 AM): and i feel horrible because i dont know what that is an acronym for AoSCDizzle667 (1:48:26 AM): Robert Kennedy. Shimbozy (1:48:34 AM): hmm Shimbozy (1:48:36 AM): yeah Shimbozy (1:48:42 AM): i dont think i know who that is Shimbozy (1:48:48 AM): which brings me to ask the question Shimbozy (1:48:56 AM): united states public school systems Shimbozy (1:49:00 AM): what the ********> (1:48:58 AM): He would have been elected President in 1968, if he hadn't been assassinated. AoSCDizzle667 (1:49:13 AM): I know. I only know these things because I've taken it upon myself to research politics. Shimbozy (1:49:36 AM): one of my roomates is a political science major Shimbozy (1:49:41 AM): he has all these liberal ideas Shimbozy (1:49:53 AM): they just seem so naive and pointless to me AoSCDizzle667 (1:50:19 AM): I'm comfortably moderate, I think. I tend to lean a little to the economic left, but modern "liberals" just don't cut it. Shimbozy (1:50:24 AM): doesnt help that the guy seems to find every possible way to sound as whiney as he can even when not whining AoSCDizzle667 (1:50:43 AM): These days, "liberal" means anti-Bush. Shimbozy (1:50:51 AM): seriously, i hate my roomates Shimbozy (1:50:55 AM): but yeah AoSCDizzle667 (1:50:52 AM): I may not like the man, but I will support my President. AoSCDizzle667 (1:50:58 AM): Roommates tend to suck. Shimbozy (1:51:29 AM): i dont think its really required or that important to support your president, i think its important to the system itself that the president does not have complete support AoSCDizzle667 (1:51:54 AM): It is, but I honestly think George Bush has owned up to the mistakes he's made, and he's at least trying. AoSCDizzle667 (1:52:09 AM): I run into people our age who actually think he should be assassinated. AoSCDizzle667 (1:52:14 AM): And it sickens me.
To those who don't talk to me on AIM, I am AoSCDizzle667. (Feel free to IM me anytime, just identify yourself, and we'll carry on a productive and likely insane conversation.) My friend is Shimbozy. We both graduated from the same high school, in the same year. He chose to go to college and attempt to do what "all high school kids do". He's largely considered himself a failure on that point, and only recently has he realized the truth: the more things change, the more they stay the same. We are both nearing the end of the first year after high school, a year we both thought we'd never see. We're both enjoying infatuation on people not near us, and we're both consoling ourselves regularly with alcohol.
That said, we also seem to have similar opinions on political theory. Which is where you come in. I want to know what people actually believe. Is communism possible in small groups? How about traditional democracy? At that, what about fascism and totalitarianism? Could I actually be elected?
In other words, to our American members, can we save our ******** country? And to our offlanders...any suggestions on how we can improve would be nice, in addition to opinions on the varying political thought.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:08 pm
I don't think that commmunism can work, under any circumstances-communism goes against human nature, and therefore will not work. Ever. Sorry. Nor traditional democracy. People don't like those things-they enjoy being anonymous, and even if they couldn't be, there are things that the community at large would turn a blind eye to-for example, if a very prominent man who was otherwise morally upright was sleeping with a 17 year old. No system is perfect, and no 'perfect system' could ever work. On a side note, if you were running, and I knew it was you, I'd do one of two things: 1 Vote for you. 2 Ask for a job writing propaganda.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:04 pm
writercxvii I don't think that commmunism can work, under any circumstances-communism goes against human nature, and therefore will not work. Ever. Sorry. Nor traditional democracy. People don't like those things-they enjoy being anonymous, and even if they couldn't be, there are things that the community at large would turn a blind eye to-for example, if a very prominent man who was otherwise morally upright was sleeping with a 17 year old. No system is perfect, and no 'perfect system' could ever work. On a side note, if you were running, and I knew it was you, I'd do one of two things: 1 Vote for you. 2 Ask for a job writing propaganda. You could have the job. And, honestly, I used to support communism, until I realized that human nature implies that without leadership, we have naught but anarchy. I'll have you know that I do plan on running someday, and I'm in favor of a loose totalitarian oligarchy rather than a democracy. That, and I consider myself a bit of a political visionary, in that I want to change what I view to be flawed. Is it possible to be a selfless dictator? Or is that mutually exclusive?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Cougar Draven Is it possible to be a selfless dictator? Or is that mutually exclusive? I suppose it's possible. Rare, but possible. Of course, you'd have to install a very secret series of checks on yourself...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:40 pm
writercxvii Cougar Draven Is it possible to be a selfless dictator? Or is that mutually exclusive? I suppose it's possible. Rare, but possible. Of course, you'd have to install a very secret series of checks on yourself...They're already there. Have been for some time now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:15 pm
Cougar Draven writercxvii Cougar Draven Is it possible to be a selfless dictator? Or is that mutually exclusive? I suppose it's possible. Rare, but possible. Of course, you'd have to install a very secret series of checks on yourself...They're already there. Have been for some time now. But how strict are they? In order to be an effective 'selfless dictator', you'd have to have a cabinet of sorts that the public didn't know about, probably made up of random people. This cabinet would have to reveiw every single descision you made, quite possibly anonymously, and would occasionally have to issue their own laws/decrees/whatever in your name. It wouyld be a lot of trouble...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:04 pm
writercxvii Cougar Draven writercxvii Cougar Draven Is it possible to be a selfless dictator? Or is that mutually exclusive? I suppose it's possible. Rare, but possible. Of course, you'd have to install a very secret series of checks on yourself...They're already there. Have been for some time now. But how strict are they? In order to be an effective 'selfless dictator', you'd have to have a cabinet of sorts that the public didn't know about, probably made up of random people. This cabinet would have to reveiw every single descision you made, quite possibly anonymously, and would occasionally have to issue their own laws/decrees/whatever in your name. It wouyld be a lot of trouble...That it would. I already have people that I know, who have the power to check my crazy decisions, but I don't know if that's enough.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:24 pm
Cougar Draven writercxvii But how strict are they? In order to be an effective 'selfless dictator', you'd have to have a cabinet of sorts that the public didn't know about, probably made up of random people. This cabinet would have to reveiw every single descision you made, quite possibly anonymously, and would occasionally have to issue their own laws/decrees/whatever in your name. It wouyld be a lot of trouble... That it would. I already have people that I know, who have the power to check my crazy decisions, but I don't know if that's enough. There's only one problem with this-they can't be people you know. You can't have any contact with them whatsoever, because if you do, then you can get revenge on them for going against your descisions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:17 pm
writercxvii Cougar Draven writercxvii But how strict are they? In order to be an effective 'selfless dictator', you'd have to have a cabinet of sorts that the public didn't know about, probably made up of random people. This cabinet would have to reveiw every single descision you made, quite possibly anonymously, and would occasionally have to issue their own laws/decrees/whatever in your name. It wouyld be a lot of trouble... That it would. I already have people that I know, who have the power to check my crazy decisions, but I don't know if that's enough. There's only one problem with this-they can't be people you know. You can't have any contact with them whatsoever, because if you do, then you can get revenge on them for going against your descisions.I know. That's part of the problem, really.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:07 pm
Cougar Draven writercxvii There's only one problem with this-they can't be people you know. You can't have any contact with them whatsoever, because if you do, then you can get revenge on them for going against your descisions. I know. That's part of the problem, really. Yeah...what you need to do is have a few people who you can trust, then have them secretly cast lots to see who is in charge of picking those in said council, then have them promise forget who they forget who they chose somehow. I'd suggest doing it while on drugs (no, seriously).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|