|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:02 am
I run openSUSE 10.2 with KDE 3.5.5 background, my computer is a Dell INPIRON 1300 laptop. My hardware consist of 80 GB HD, my processor is a 1.60 Ghz Celeron M, Ram wise i have 512 MB. I have no problem with this set up, really i think KDE is faster than GNOME in this release.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:44 am
I run openSUSE 10 with a Gnome front end. The computer is a Dell Latitude Pentium, III with 40GB HDD and 256 meg of RAM. I like it but setting up an MP3 player program seems to be quite difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:26 pm
If you can install Amarok onto your gnome then you just have to add packman to your install source and it has the required plug-ins and add-ons to allow you to play MP3 file format, along with allowing you to burn cds with mp3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:45 pm
I'll try it. Thanks allot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:20 pm
I use SuSE at work it is 10.1 and I dont like it wery much it isnt the Linux I want to use but I have to use that or Window$ and I prefer Linux. Suse doesnt sucks but Yast is the thing I dont like much it is slow and written in Java and I dislike Java so that is the only - in suse for me razz otherwise It is ok distro razz .
I hope that I didnt make anyone angry or anything redface
Just wanted to tell you all that I use suse somewhere biggrin .
But KDE is bether at some point than Gnome but gnome is more plesent for users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:27 pm
That is because you are running YaST though the GUI, you can also run YaST though the consel, which is 100 times faster because it doesn't have to load any images. About SuSE being an 'ok' Distro, SuSE is one of the first Linux distro's on the market starting with there 4.2 release (a joke from Hichhickers Guide).
Side note: everyone is entitled to here option, so there is really no need to worry about being sorry if you made anyone angry, if they can't take a little criticism on there distro maybe they should go back to windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:43 pm
hehhe vendion you are all cool. I know that suse is one of the first distros like debian, gentoo, slackaware and some other.
about yast yea probably I should use it in console biggrin . but I use it only at work.
I know that suse is one of the moust suported distros out there so it is cool to have it. but if you want to work wit your Linux suse isnt the best thiung out there there are slackware and Gentoo that are all about console and nothing more :d.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:08 pm
I don't really care for Gentoo, I "boughed" one of my friends laptops to try out Gentoo, and I really wasn't able to get into it. xd
And when I say "boughed" its more like I ran off with it for an hour, thats what he gets for logging in and just leaving it in the class room ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:18 pm
I have Suse 10 with all the patches on a dell with 2.55 GHZ cpu and 512 memory and a GB of swap It runs good however it runs a little rough but is useable is it because of the change between regular mem-swap
Would it run better if I Instaled Suse 10.2 would it run beter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:43 pm
The only true way to see is if you install it, I don't see why not with your 2.55 GHZ processor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:37 am
hmm my laptop has 70gig hardrive, 256 ram, proccesor im not sure, and i have both SUSE 10.1 and windows xp running oh and now i put a program called PCsomewhere i think ill double check its a really hard program. but i didn't know 10.2 came out yet ill have to get it sooner or later
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:42 pm
10.2 Came out December 12, and you might as well wait because 10.3 is going to be coming out at the end of this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:21 pm
I finally got 10.2 after a few hours on my grandparents Dsl it runs great and i am very pleased jmad980 I have Suse 10 with all the patches on a dell with 2.55 GHZ cpu and 512 memory and a GB of swap It runs good however it runs a little rough but is useable is it because of the change between regular mem-swap Would it run better if I Instaled Suse 10.2 would it run beter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
