|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:03 pm
The original moon landing, real or fake?
I believe that for many possibilities that it could be real, "oh but the flag was moving and theres no air in space," the guy was swinging it a little bit, like you swing a golf club........upside-down
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:37 am
lol, if it's fake, I'm very confused how so many measurements have been taken with Laser Ranging to find The Moon's exact Orbital Characteristics. See, Apollo 14 put down some mirrors on The Moon's Surface, so we can fire Lasers at it and record how long it takes for them to bounce back - which tells us how far away it is at that specific time. If Apollo was fake.... how did the mirrors get there? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Aristocrat Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:09 am
I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose.
That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space.
A fascinating anecdote:
NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:31 am
donnythephoenix I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose. That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space. A fascinating anecdote: NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils. I agree, although I do believe that it was real, it was the concept not the actual act was the purpose. *laughing hysterically* thats great Jon, although I can see the advantages to writing official documents, measurements, records, etc. in ink since it cant be erased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:01 pm
moon_child113 donnythephoenix I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose. That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space. A fascinating anecdote: NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils. I agree, although I do believe that it was real, it was the concept not the actual act was the purpose. *laughing hysterically* thats great Jon, although I can see the advantages to writing official documents, measurements, records, etc. in ink since it cant be erased. ... why would you be writing official documents in space? And anyway, if it's a closed community, who would rub it out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:10 pm
Emmanuela moon_child113 donnythephoenix I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose. That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space. A fascinating anecdote: NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils. I agree, although I do believe that it was real, it was the concept not the actual act was the purpose. *laughing hysterically* thats great Jon, although I can see the advantages to writing official documents, measurements, records, etc. in ink since it cant be erased. ... why would you be writing official documents in space? And anyway, if it's a closed community, who would rub it out? official documents about the space-station, sattelites (sorry about the spelling ) etc... just percautions, its the potencial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:13 pm
moon_child113 Emmanuela moon_child113 donnythephoenix I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose. That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space. A fascinating anecdote: NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils. I agree, although I do believe that it was real, it was the concept not the actual act was the purpose. *laughing hysterically* thats great Jon, although I can see the advantages to writing official documents, measurements, records, etc. in ink since it cant be erased. ... why would you be writing official documents in space? And anyway, if it's a closed community, who would rub it out? official documents about the space-station, sattelites (sorry about the spelling ) etc... just percautions, its the potencial. Well... hm, maybe I suppose. Anyway, I think it was real and that pretty much all evidence against it is prefabricated for conspiracy theorists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:14 pm
moon_child113 Emmanuela moon_child113 donnythephoenix I think it's irrelevant. It gave a message to the world, and that was it's purpose. That said, nine years earlier the russians got into space. A fascinating anecdote: NASA spent years working on a pen that would work in space. The russians used pencils. I agree, although I do believe that it was real, it was the concept not the actual act was the purpose. *laughing hysterically* thats great Jon, although I can see the advantages to writing official documents, measurements, records, etc. in ink since it cant be erased. ... why would you be writing official documents in space? And anyway, if it's a closed community, who would rub it out? official documents about the space-station, sattelites (sorry about the spelling ) etc... just percautions, its the potencial. Yes, but someones hardly going to come up to you once your out of space with an eraser and say "HAHA I WILL ERASE YOUR WORK! HAHA!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Aristocrat Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:17 pm
no they wouldnt do that would they?
precaution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:27 pm
Hm, I must say, lots of precaustions are unnessisary. I mean, in England you can't have half the chemicals in schools that you can in Australia, it's rediculous!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Aristocrat Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:50 pm
Emmanuela Hm, I must say, lots of precaustions are unnessisary. I mean, in England you can't have half the chemicals in schools that you can in Australia, it's rediculous! Yeah I know! The best we get is a bit of Caesium!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:51 pm
personally i think that the landing on the moon was real but then they shot it in a studio to make it seem more heroic or dramitic!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Aristocrat Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:54 pm
Titania Von Doom personally i think that the landing on the moon was real but then they shot it in a studio to make it seem more heroic or dramitic! Ella, you are crazy! biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:55 pm
donnythephoenix Emmanuela Hm, I must say, lots of precaustions are unnessisary. I mean, in England you can't have half the chemicals in schools that you can in Australia, it's rediculous! Yeah I know! The best we get is a bit of Caesium! What? We don't get caesium at our school! No fair!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:07 pm
donnythephoenix Emmanuela Hm, I must say, lots of precaustions are unnessisary. I mean, in England you can't have half the chemicals in schools that you can in Australia, it's rediculous! Yeah I know! The best we get is a bit of Caesium! And not even that, half the time... "Yeah! We've touched down on the moon!" "Yeah... pretty cool, huh?" "Oh, sure... crap, where'd I put the camera!?! Dammit! Left it behind..." "Oh s**t... guess we'd better just do it later in the studio..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
