|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:59 am
This is my deck. Tell me what you think.
MONSTERS
Lava Golem
Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys (2)
Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch (2)
Solar Flare Dragon (3)
UFO Turtle (3)
Barrier Statue of the Inferno (2)
Hand of Nephthys (2)
Fox Fire (3)
Raging Flame Sprite (2)
SPELLS
Dark Room of Nightmare (2)
Meteor of Destruction (2)
Misfortune (2)
Smashing Ground (2)
TRAPS
Backfire (2)
Astral Barrier (2)
Spirit Barrier (2)
Gravity Bind*
Barrel Behind the Door (2)
Ring of Destruction
Ojama Trio (2)
SIDE DECK
Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV8
Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV6 (2)
Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV4 (3)
Infernal Flame Emperor
Flame Ruler (2)
Tenkabito Shien (2)
Firebird (2)
Spiritual Fire Art - Kurenai (2)
*Currently standing in for Level Limit Area B.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:49 am
Hmm I hade a deck like this before and had 2 Inferno Reckless Summon in it. For the ability to summon 3 Solare Flare Dragons at the same time, (and or Flame Sprite and baseball kid).
Hmm and if dueling someone with a meta deck with only 1 or 2 of each monster. It could be useful.
Well atleast it was for my strategy I guess ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:41 pm
Mike Crow Hmm I hade a deck like this before and had 2 Inferno Reckless Summon in it. For the ability to summon 3 Solare Flare Dragons at the same time, (and or Flame Sprite and baseball kid). Hmm and if dueling someone with a meta deck with only 1 or 2 of each monster. It could be useful. Well atleast it was for my strategy I guess ^^ Except her deck holds no cards whatsoever that'd be able to be used in sync with Inferno Reckless Summon.
The deck lacks much consistency.
I count 9 continuous spells and traps, alongside 2 Nephthys.
Self-conflicting deck.
The Astral Barrier/Spirit Barrier combo is very inconsistent.
For one thing, it depends on your timing. You won't always get the cards fast enough and at the same time.
For another, it depends too much on one card or the other staying in play.
Once both are in play, once in is gone the combo is torn to pieces.
Now there's really only two routes you can go with Fire decks.
There's burn, and aggro.
Your trying to incorporate both in one makes it inconsistent and random.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 am
Global Genocide Mike Crow Hmm I hade a deck like this before and had 2 Inferno Reckless Summon in it. For the ability to summon 3 Solare Flare Dragons at the same time, (and or Flame Sprite and baseball kid). Hmm and if dueling someone with a meta deck with only 1 or 2 of each monster. It could be useful. Well atleast it was for my strategy I guess ^^ Except her deck holds no cards whatsoever that'd be able to be used in sync with Inferno Reckless Summon.
The deck lacks much consistency.
I count 9 continuous spells and traps, alongside 2 Nephthys.
Self-conflicting deck.
The Astral Barrier/Spirit Barrier combo is very inconsistent.
For one thing, it depends on your timing. You won't always get the cards fast enough and at the same time.
For another, it depends too much on one card or the other staying in play.
Once both are in play, once in is gone the combo is torn to pieces.
Now there's really only two routes you can go with Fire decks.
There's burn, and aggro.
Your trying to incorporate both in one makes it inconsistent and random. Everything you just said is easily countered. A- Nephthys is only used when I have few or no s/t on the field. Hand of Nephthys gives me the option of summoning it quickly when I need it. B- I only have two or three continous cards active at once. It's pointless to have Spirit/Astral active at the same time as Level Limit (I got one in the past few days). C- I don't see how Spirit/Astral Barrier combo is inconsistant. It keeps my monsters and LP safe at the same time, sort of like a continous Waboku. D- Inferno Reckless Summon can be used with monsters with 1500 attack or less. Solar Flare Dragon, UFO Turtle, Raging Flame Sprite, Barrier Statue of the Inferno, Hand of Nephthys, and Fox Fire all fall into that category. E- My main deck is burn and sides into aggro. The main burn/aggro is in the monsters. The s/t can support both types of decks. I think you're just jealous that you didn't think of it first. I've only lost once with the burn deck, against a Skill Drain build with normal monsters. I remedied the problem by switching side decking and took back the match 1-2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:32 am
What are you countering? You're further supporting my views.
A. Nephthys used in such a deck makes the deck inconsistent. Why have a card in a deck when you're not even going to use it half the time, nor plan on it? The deck lacks in topdecking enough as is.
B. What in God's name are you going on about?
C. Let's use a scenario here:
You've any monster on the field, alongside the whole Spirit/Astral Barrier combo active.
Your opponent summons a Cyber Dragon, and a Don Zaloog, then rids of your Spirit Barrier. Congrats, you just lost 3500 Life Points, and a card from your hand.
D. You've got the monsters, but no way to special summon them validly to activate Inferno Reckless Summon. UFO Turtle does not work with Inferno Reckless Summon, as UFO Turtle's effect happens in the Damage Step. You can't activate quickplay spells in the Damage Step unless they increase or decrease the ATK or DEF of one of the monsters on the field. Does Inferno Reckless Summon do that? No. Do you have any other valid method of special summoning via Inferno Reckless Summon? Aside from Fox Fire, no.
E. Again, what's with the pointless ranting?
Jealous? Of what? An inconsistent deck with hardly any point?
I hardly like Fire monsters as is, and your pile of cards isn't anything to drool over.
Not even close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:00 am
Wow <.< someones sounds angry <.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:20 am
Global Genocide What are you countering? You're further supporting my views.
A. Nephthys used in such a deck makes the deck inconsistent. Why have a card in a deck when you're not even going to use it half the time, nor plan on it? The deck lacks in topdecking enough as is.
B. What in God's name are you going on about?
C. Let's use a scenario here:
You've any monster on the field, alongside the whole Spirit/Astral Barrier combo active.
Your opponent summons a Cyber Dragon, and a Don Zaloog, then rids of your Spirit Barrier. Congrats, you just lost 3500 Life Points, and a card from your hand.
D. You've got the monsters, but no way to special summon them validly to activate Inferno Reckless Summon. UFO Turtle does not work with Inferno Reckless Summon, as UFO Turtle's effect happens in the Damage Step. You can't activate quickplay spells in the Damage Step unless they increase or decrease the ATK or DEF of one of the monsters on the field. Does Inferno Reckless Summon do that? No. Do you have any other valid method of special summoning via Inferno Reckless Summon? Aside from Fox Fire, no.
E. Again, what's with the pointless ranting?
Jealous? Of what? An inconsistent deck with hardly any point?
I hardly like Fire monsters as is, and your pile of cards isn't anything to drool over.
Not even close. A- Since you say all my s/t are going to be destroyed, then Nephthys is helpful since I won't have anything to be destroyed. Thanks for contradicting yourself. B- You say having so many continuous cards is a bad thing which sounds to me like you think I'm going to have every one of them active at the same time. C- You seem to forget that Astral Barrier is an optional effect. Try actually reading cards before you post nonsense like that. D- You forget about any card my opponent has. I could chain Inferno Reckless Summon to the special summoning effect of their own Inferno Reckless Summon. E- You said I'm mixing aggro with burn. I'm not. You've obviously proven that you have no idea what you're talking about. You should stop while you're behind so you won't fall even farther back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:26 am
Sounds like the start of a cat fight so girls... just try to keep it friendly ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:42 pm
Phoenix-Flower-1986 A- Since you say all my s/t are going to be destroyed, then Nephthys is helpful since I won't have anything to be destroyed. Thanks for contradicting yourself. Where the hell did I say that? Phoenix-Flower-1986 B- You say having so many continuous cards is a bad thing which sounds to me like you think I'm going to have every one of them active at the same time. No, I said having so many continuous cards in the same deck as Nephthys is a bad thing, as it contradicts with the big bird. Why have cards in a deck, when yopu're planning on destroying the cards yourself(unless that's part of the deck's job, which in this case it isn't). Phoenix-Flower-1986 C- You seem to forget that Astral Barrier is an optional effect. Try actually reading cards before you post nonsense like that. I admit, that was my mistake.
However, what's the point of having a card with no real use once the combo is broken? Most likely by your own Nephthys too. Seems more like nonsense to me. Phoenix-Flower-1986 D- You forget about any card my opponent has. I could chain Inferno Reckless Summon to the special summoning effect of their own Inferno Reckless Summon. What's the point of having a card you're not even going to use with your own? You're relying on the chance that they're going to special summon a monster of 1500 or less ATK. Fat chance. Nowadays on the competitive scene most of the special summoning comes from monsters whom are more than 1500 ATK(Cyber Dragons, Hydrogeddon, The Rock Spirit, Gigantes, Doom Dozer, Demise, Grandmaster of the Six Samurai, etc.), recruiters(Mystic Tomato, Giant Rat, etc.), and Treeborn Frog.
Honestly, who really runs Inferno reckless Summon on a competitive level? Phoenix-Flower-1986 E- You said I'm mixing aggro with burn. I'm not. You've got Nephthys, Thestalos, and Raging Flame Sprite, all cards which support some kind of aggro deck(and add little support to a burn deck), in a burn deck. Phoenix-Flower-1986 You've obviously proven that you have no idea what you're talking about. You should stop while you're behind so you won't fall even farther back. Hypocracy is a b***h, aint she?
You showed your deck. You asked what we though.
I gave you my honest opinion. You started bitching.
You could've easily tried to counter everything without the use of hostility if you had kept your little disrespectful remark to yourself.
I suggest you win a few high-scaled tournaments before you start acting like an all-knowing god.
Locals don't count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
