|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:03 pm
A friend told me of her language teacher (atheist), this is what she said:
teacher: I've been to different Catholic churches and I know that you have to be 100% devoted to do communion, well in these catholic churches whose sermons I sat in on, I noticed that none of the them were 100% devoted. Therefore, it's a hypocrisy.
my friend: *raises her hand* so you have nothing better to do with your time than to go to different catholic churches and tell them what each person is thinking?
teacher:....Go outside, and you have detention.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:14 am
*stifles laughter* that's funny, I wish i could have that on film...youtube would be calling my name. That sounds so hilarious, but if you're oging to minister you need to find a more Christ-like way, think a little more respectful...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:22 pm
I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that.
The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical.
The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:16 pm
How does the teacher know that everybody wasn't 100% devoted, wouldn't that be judging which is just as bad as hipocrisy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:47 pm
rstrategos How does the teacher know that everybody wasn't 100% devoted, wouldn't that be judging which is just as bad as hipocrisy? Judging is only bad in the Christian religion. If this teacher isn't Christian.... And besides, sinning means you're not one hundred percent devoted. It's not judging to point this out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:28 am
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. Dude the Bible says judge not less ye be judged for whatever judgement you use to judge others you will be judged with, you should not judge so harshly and also if you have a problem with it you know what you should do is show them the error of their ways tell them to repent and help them to move on, not condemn them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:32 am
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori rstrategos How does the teacher know that everybody wasn't 100% devoted, wouldn't that be judging which is just as bad as hipocrisy? Judging is only bad in the Christian religion. If this teacher isn't Christian.... And besides, sinning means you're not one hundred percent devoted. It's not judging to point this out. nope it's bad in other religions as well as well as just morally wrong, also everyone sins the important is to repent and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:06 am
NewFoundLight Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori rstrategos How does the teacher know that everybody wasn't 100% devoted, wouldn't that be judging which is just as bad as hipocrisy? Judging is only bad in the Christian religion. If this teacher isn't Christian.... And besides, sinning means you're not one hundred percent devoted. It's not judging to point this out. nope it's bad in other religions as well as well as just morally wrong, also everyone sins the important is to repent and move on. I really don't get how I keep having to point out that morals are subjective. Why do you people expect everyone to have the exact same morals as you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:09 am
NewFoundLight Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. Dude the Bible says judge not less ye be judged for whatever judgement you use to judge others you will be judged with, you should not judge so harshly and also if you have a problem with it you know what you should do is show them the error of their ways tell them to repent and help them to move on, not condemn them. I think you're using the wrong form of the word judge. The biblical use of the word judge involves punishment. I'm simply stating who I think was right and who I think was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:39 pm
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. So you're saying, if I was bigoted (which I'm not) toward, let's say, wiccans, and I went to one of their rituals of protection, and I said that they were hypocrites and that they weren't devoted. This teacher was totally out of line. That's like saying to a gay "your not devoted to what you do *or* your not one-hundred percent gay". That would piss some people off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:57 am
IrelandGunner Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. So you're saying, if I was bigoted (which I'm not) toward, let's say, wiccans, and I went to one of their rituals of protection, and I said that they were hypocrites and that they weren't devoted. This teacher was totally out of line. That's like saying to a gay "your not devoted to what you do *or* your not one-hundred percent gay". That would piss some people off. Wrong. Homosexuals don't have to be devoted. It's a biological trait and is unchangeable. Religion, on the other hand, is a concious decision to follow the laws of a deity. This is a false analogy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:29 pm
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori IrelandGunner Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. So you're saying, if I was bigoted (which I'm not) toward, let's say, wiccans, and I went to one of their rituals of protection, and I said that they were hypocrites and that they weren't devoted. This teacher was totally out of line. That's like saying to a gay "your not devoted to what you do *or* your not one-hundred percent gay". That would piss some people off. Wrong. Homosexuals don't have to be devoted. It's a biological trait and is unchangeable. Religion, on the other hand, is a concious decision to follow the laws of a deity. This is a false analogy. Are you sure because I have heard of people who are no longer homosexual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 pm
IrelandGunner A friend told me of her language teacher (atheist), this is what she said: teacher: I've been to different Catholic churches and I know that you have to be 100% devoted to do communion, well in these catholic churches whose sermons I sat in on, I noticed that none of the them were 100% devoted. Therefore, it's a hypocrisy. my friend: *raises her hand* so you have nothing better to do with your time than to go to different catholic churches and tell them what each person is thinking? teacher:....Go outside, and you have detention. I think it's funny even thought I would never have done that..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:33 pm
ryokomayuka Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori IrelandGunner Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. So you're saying, if I was bigoted (which I'm not) toward, let's say, wiccans, and I went to one of their rituals of protection, and I said that they were hypocrites and that they weren't devoted. This teacher was totally out of line. That's like saying to a gay "your not devoted to what you do *or* your not one-hundred percent gay". That would piss some people off. Wrong. Homosexuals don't have to be devoted. It's a biological trait and is unchangeable. Religion, on the other hand, is a concious decision to follow the laws of a deity. This is a false analogy. Are you sure because I have heard of people who are no longer homosexual. It's very rare for even a superficial change, and even then it doesn't truely change sexuality, it just teaches people to use a form of doublethink to deny themselves even noticing people of the same gender. In most cases it only causes suicidal feelings or extreme repression that then has to be gotten rid of with years of TRUE therapy. Reparative Therapy- Estimates of Success- Anything But Straight: Ex-Gay History- Ex-Gay Watch: News and Analysis of Ex-Gay Politics- The Ex Files: Not Your Usual Gays- Facts About Changing Sexual Orientation- Critique of Spitzer's "Ex-Gay" Study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:36 pm
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori ryokomayuka Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori IrelandGunner Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori I completely agree with the teacher, and the student was totally out of line to say that. The teacher is completely correct in her label of hypocrite for Catholics who take communion without being devoted to the church. It IS completely hypocritical. The student not only ignored the main point of her teacher's statement, she used a false assumption to insult her teacher. There are many reasons the teacher might have gone to many Catholic churches, including family, friends, and faith at a previous time in her life. Not only that, but how do you know the teacher was Athiest? She was disgusted by hypocritical Christians? I'm disgusted by hypocritical Christians. You really cannot be a true Christian without being disgusted by hypocritical Christians. So you're saying, if I was bigoted (which I'm not) toward, let's say, wiccans, and I went to one of their rituals of protection, and I said that they were hypocrites and that they weren't devoted. This teacher was totally out of line. That's like saying to a gay "your not devoted to what you do *or* your not one-hundred percent gay". That would piss some people off. Wrong. Homosexuals don't have to be devoted. It's a biological trait and is unchangeable. Religion, on the other hand, is a concious decision to follow the laws of a deity. This is a false analogy. Are you sure because I have heard of people who are no longer homosexual. It's very rare for even a superficial change, and even then it doesn't truely change sexuality, it just teaches people to use a form of doublethink to deny themselves even noticing people of the same gender. In most cases it only causes suicidal feelings or extreme repression that then has to be gotten rid of with years of TRUE therapy. Reparative Therapy- Estimates of Success- Anything But Straight: Ex-Gay History- Ex-Gay Watch: News and Analysis of Ex-Gay Politics- The Ex Files: Not Your Usual Gays- Facts About Changing Sexual Orientation- Critique of Spitzer's "Ex-Gay" StudyWhy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
