|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:22 pm
There have been a lot of issues with people not going online, or only posting once a day, therefore being very, very difficult targets that hold up the game.
I've had a suggestion passed to me that there should be a rule requiring at least five posts a day to show activity. And, like in the Sniper Game, you are out of the game after three consecutive days of inactivity, or five individual days of inactivity.
The requirement would be 5 posts according to your post count. Meaning, they can be anywhere, in forums or in guilds. Hidden and private guilds are still valid.
So, does this sound reasonable to you guys?
Vote with an 'aye' or a 'nay' in response to this rule.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:58 pm
I say nay just because I don't think it should be nearly that high a number. Personally I think that it would be to easy with 5 posts. I's say around 2 or three would be fair.
>[+_+]<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:30 pm
I agree with Edmond Dantes, so nay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:59 pm
So for both of you it would be an 'Aye' if it was a 3 post requirement?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:51 pm
Edmond Dantes I say nay just because I don't think it should be nearly that high a number. Personally I think that it would be to easy with 5 posts. I's say around 2 or three would be fair. >[+_+]<I agree with Ed. Aye if that's the case. Nay if not. Plus, they have to be in actual places, right? Not just posting in your own guild 3 times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:05 pm
I don't know about having the posts every day either. Sometimes things come up or you end up busy with some RL stuff and might not get to log on.
Nay for the rule as it is. But aye if there are modifications like 2-3 posts a day. Or at least having logged in once every 24 hrs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:16 pm
K I N G S H O Y Edmond Dantes I say nay just because I don't think it should be nearly that high a number. Personally I think that it would be to easy with 5 posts. I's say around 2 or three would be fair. >[+_+]<I agree with Ed. Aye if that's the case. Nay if not. Plus, they have to be in actual places, right? Not just posting in your own guild 3 times.
@ Insom - I understand that stuff comes up. I would never kick someone out just for missing one day. Five days, however, is a very big difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:23 pm
yeah, I would probably say Aye.
>[+_+]<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:49 pm
I would say aye to some sort of post requirement.
I can understand missing a day due to RL issues/whatnot, but posting once a day makes for frustration and less enjoyment for the sniper.
I know, cause I got two targets who posted on average once a day. ;o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:51 pm
Here's something else to add to that: all their posts can't be in the safe zone here or only in this guild with the blue safety fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
