|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:19 pm
I was wondering if anyone if anyone in this community has read Lolita, or seen the movie(the original or the remake)
I read it for the first time when I was 13, and now I'm 18. It's one of my favorite books, and I love the movie remake of it. If Nabovok hadn't written Lolita, there might be no (EG)L movement/lifestlye/fashion/whatever today. The novel is about a man whose first loved died when she was very young, thus stunting him(Humbert Humbert) emotionally.
Many years later, he is a teacher who is looking for a house to stay at close to where he teaches. One of the houses has a young girl named Lolita that he falls in love with. He marries her mother to be closer to Lolita, yada yada yada. If you haven't read this, I strongly suggest you do. No matter if you're a lolly or not, this is a great book.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:38 pm
I have seen the movie, I think it was the remake, I wasn't aware there was a book.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:27 pm
While I do believe the literary work was well written, I also find it an abomination, as I have every reason to be against *****. In fact, I'm very against it. My friend Leah, whose age is 16 at the moment, is dating a 31 year old, and I find even that gap to be horrible. I'll never say it was a bad book. Its just that I find the fact of the older man falling for the really young girl to be disgusting. Read it if you want to. I'm not saying don't. I'm just voicing my opinion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:10 pm
Winter Black While I do believe the literary work was well written, I also find it an abomination, as I have every reason to be against *****. In fact, I'm very against it. My friend Leah, whose age is 16 at the moment, is dating a 31 year old, and I find even that gap to be horrible. I'll never say it was a bad book. Its just that I find the fact of the older man falling for the really young girl to be disgusting. Read it if you want to. I'm not saying don't. I'm just voicing my opinion. I agree. I am not a supporter of child molestation in any way shape or form. Even if I was attracted to people younger than 18, I would never attempt to pursue anything with them. Child porn and Child molestation are ugly and nasty.
However, it's not real. Pulp Fiction is one of my favorite movies, but I don't agree with murder or drugs, but I know that it's just fiction.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:38 pm
I haven't gotten around to reading the book or watching the movie, though it is on my list of things to do. But I'm home of the summer with my family and even since my dad found out I like EGL he's been on my back so I'm going to have to wait for school to start again.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:22 am
[Kinky] Winter Black While I do believe the literary work was well written, I also find it an abomination, as I have every reason to be against *****. In fact, I'm very against it. My friend Leah, whose age is 16 at the moment, is dating a 31 year old, and I find even that gap to be horrible. I'll never say it was a bad book. Its just that I find the fact of the older man falling for the really young girl to be disgusting. Read it if you want to. I'm not saying don't. I'm just voicing my opinion. I agree. I am not a supporter of child molestation in any way shape or form. Even if I was attracted to people younger than 18, I would never attempt to pursue anything with them. Child porn and Child molestation are ugly and nasty.
However, it's not real. Pulp Fiction is one of my favorite movies, but I don't agree with murder or drugs, but I know that it's just fiction. very nicely put, I wanted to say the same thing put couldn't figure out how to say it nicely.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:17 am
I saw the remake of the movie last year, was asking my boyfriend what Lolita is and he said its a movie and book. He didn't know it has anything to do with fashion.
I don't remember how some of the parts went, but the story is great. In a way, I don't think it has anything to do with *****, at least the relationship with the main man and the girl. The man is growing old physically, but not mentally. But then again, I wonder if most of the ***** are that way. gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:19 am
Kaiwi I saw the remake of the movie last year, was asking my boyfriend what Lolita is and he said its a movie and book. He didn't know it has anything to do with fashion I don't remember how some of the parts went, but the story is great. In a way, I don't think it has anything to do with *****, at least the relationship with the main man and the girl. The man is growing old physically, but not mentally. But then again, I wonder if most of the ***** are that way. gonk Well, I don't know if ***** are mentally/emotionally stunted. Some are...but then, aren't lolitas supposed to be? I mean teen girls and women dressing up as elaborately dressed children/dolls? Though we may not be truly stunted, I suppose we have to act that way.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:49 pm
[Kinky] Kaiwi I saw the remake of the movie last year, was asking my boyfriend what Lolita is and he said its a movie and book. He didn't know it has anything to do with fashion I don't remember how some of the parts went, but the story is great. In a way, I don't think it has anything to do with *****, at least the relationship with the main man and the girl. The man is growing old physically, but not mentally. But then again, I wonder if most of the ***** are that way. gonk Well, I don't know if ***** are mentally/emotionally stunted. Some are...but then, aren't lolitas supposed to be? I mean teen girls and women dressing up as elaborately dressed children/dolls? Though we may not be truly stunted, I suppose we have to act that way.That's a good point. while many ***** can be mentally stunted they are also recognize adult cravings. the story is not like that. if a couple fall in love at age 16 is it wrong for that man 50 years later to still love that 16 yr old girl?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:11 pm
Child mollestation is bad, but I still think it would be a good read to check out some time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:09 pm
I read it about a year ago, and I rather enjoyed it. It was well-written, and comedic, if you are awake enough to understand it (half the time I wasn't).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:33 pm
Well, I've read most of the book, but had to return it to the library. I'll have to finish it when I get to borrow it again. It's fairly good so far.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:57 pm
I liked it. I thought it was a sad story though, not because of Dolores, but because of Humbert Humbert and his unrequited love for Dolores, and his unfulfilled love for Annabel.
People often say that there is no link between the novel and Lolita :s But how can there not be a link? Some of the ways he decribes nymphets are almost exactly the Lolita fashion ideal. I'm sure the people who have read the book noticed this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:18 pm
Machika Balfaltin People often say that there is no link between the novel and Lolita :s But how can there not be a link? Some of the ways he decribes nymphets are almost exactly the Lolita fashion ideal. I'm sure the people who have read the book noticed this.Could you explain? I've never read the book, much less seen it at libraries or bookstores near where I live (this could be due to the large numbers of ***** living in the area).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:38 pm
Seraphynthetic Machika Balfaltin People often say that there is no link between the novel and Lolita :s But how can there not be a link? Some of the ways he decribes nymphets are almost exactly the Lolita fashion ideal. I'm sure the people who have read the book noticed this.Could you explain? I've never read the book, much less seen it at libraries or bookstores near where I live (this could be due to the large numbers of ***** living in the area). Sorry. What I meant was, he describes the young girls who he's attracted to as nymphets - not all of them, but some of them, who are the most like his ideal. He says nymphets are basically young-looking (obviously) and thin, with kind of blank-looking eyes and long eyelashes, or something like that. I'm sure there was more and I didn't even articulate that well, but it's all I can remember.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|