|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:52 pm
just hypothetically speaking lol
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:33 am
Something strong enough to survive a black hole...? I can only imagine...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:32 am
What do you mean when you say "something indestructible"? If you're speaking of something that's indestructible by our standards on Earth, well... normal laws of physics kind of get thrown out the window in black holes. I would imagine that there probably is not anything in existence that could survive the massive gravity of a black hole... but one theory I heard is that black holes might link to each other, so assuming something did manage to survive its trip into gravityland, it might pop out somewhere else in the universe. I highly doubt it would be able to do so, though, and even if it did I'm doubtful it would be able to leave the second black hole so it would probably just be stuck in limbo between them I suppose. XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:37 pm
Who knows? If there's something on the other end of the black hole, it'll probably be sucked in. If not, the object would probably hover in the center. Imagine if it were an indestructible clock, or better yet, and indestructible person. What would the universe look like from their point of view? Present theory suggests that, from the person's point of view, the universe would be running in fast forward. From our point of view, the person would move in slow motion. It has something to do with Einstein's theories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:35 am
I don't think there actually is something "indestructible" in the universe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:45 pm
I think that if something indestructible went into a black hole it might still be there but it most definitely won't be quite the same as it went in. Indestructible doesn't mean unchangeable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
