|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:58 pm
I managed to find a copy of Seven-Per-Cent Solution at a used book store near by, and I went and picked it up from her. She is a chatty cat, so we talked for a while, mostly Sherlocky stuff because of the book. Somehow it came around to different schools of thought. You know, what is Watson's real first name, his war wound, routine stuff.
Then she mentions that there is a small debate about whether Holmes was possibly dyslexic. I had never heard of this before, and it never occured to me either.
She pointed out that in the adventures, Holmes never read any of the messages that were sent to him, he had always had Watson read the notes for him. That this was possibly because he had learning disabilities and couldn't read. Now, during our conversation, I couldn't recall if this is true or not, but then again when I am usually reading the stories I am not looking for dyslexia. I'm going to have to go over them again.
I pointed out that Watson met Holmes when Holmes was a student, and she recognized it, but pointed out that we didn't know how well he had done in school (aside from the chemestry and whatnot). She also cited the fact that Holmes picked out details very particularly was a possible sign.
It's an interesting thought. I'm going to skim them over to see if I am able to find Holmes reading something without somehow tricking Watson into doing it for him, cause I do not recall one at the moment. That may change later, though.
Any thoughts? Do you have any evidence in either case?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:10 pm
Yes. He would read the newspapers every morning, particularly the agony columns (personals), and then cut out anything he considered important & paste the articles in his notebooks.
He'd have to be able to read pretty well if he was going to comb the newspapers for clues and/or codes.
And there's the Dancing Men code he cracked....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:22 pm
Right, Right. True that.
I wonder how this whole idea came up. Did Holmes never read anything to Watson?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:26 pm
Just people seizing on that fact that Holmes often had Watson read things to him. Other theories I have heard hinging on that detail are about Holmes having bad eyesight (also pretty dumb--given the minute clues he examines all the time). Could just be he likes to hear how Watson reads it-- listening to the things he emphasizes, for instance. It would be like seeing the data with a second set of eyes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planck`s_Constant Captain
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:54 pm
I sometimes ask people to read things to me, because I pick up different nuances in sentence structure when I hear things than when I read them. It engages a different part of the brain, and is therefore useful for seeing different patterns. Holmes most likely knew this, since a good deal of the brain had already been mapped in his time by use of lesion case study.
In addition, he had already read the note from the King of Bohemia when he asked Watson to read it aloud to him. Actually, a good many of the things he asked Watson to read aloud were items he had already at least skimmed himself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:44 pm
People take in and retain information in different ways, too. Some do best reading, others from listening, and others from hands-on work like writing. He might both read it & listen to it to absorb and remember everything possible from the data.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planck`s_Constant Captain
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:36 pm
Ooh, this is getting into interesting waters: The Psychology of a Holmes. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:29 pm
I think Doyle had Holmes giving Watson things to read as a way of including Watson in a story, so readers won't think that he's just sitting there like a lump on a log while Holmes reads things. Kind of like giving Watson a share of the spotlight, so it's not Holmes all the time that has a dialogue.
Also, Holmes often gave Watson things to read in order to pick up on clues, to somewhat train him in deduction. There had been instances where Holmes would ask Watson about things like how the pen was held, if the letter was written by a man or woman, and how long the ink dried between words, stuff like that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|