View User's Journal



HOMGZ I HAVEN'T WRITTEN IN SO LONG!!! SORRY GUYS! Um, yeah...the title pretty much explains it all. News: Joined softball team, crushed pitiful opponents in yesterday's game 13-2. I almost felt sorry for them when it was 8-0. sigh Well, life goes on: going on a school trip soon, Jen's getting her wisdom teeth out (will she be more stupid? let's find out... twisted ) and my brother's as annoying as ever. Made some new friends, went to a few parties...god, you people out there in Readerland must be bored out of your mind by now. Am I right, people? Yeah, I thought so. So I'll move on. I just finished "Animal Farm" by George Orwell (I've already read "1984" wink and loved it so much I immersed myself in USSR history. Of course, Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky got me interested in Communism, Capitalism, Socialism, Musselini (sp?), Hitler, and Totalitarianism. Wow, that was a mouthful (or rather a keyboard-ful). Oh, and three new favorite series: Maximum Ride Series by James Patterson, Pendragon Series by D.J. MacHale, and The Looking-Glass Wars Series by Frank Something-or-Other. So that's all the news for this week, kids! Quote of the Entry: Before you criticize a person, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them you're a mile away and you have their shoes. Side Note: Who's going to claim to be Daniellyn's father next? Larry Birkhead, Howard Stern, Zsa Zsa Gabor's husband, the gardener, and O.J. Simpson have all thrown their hat in. Cesar, James? Why not make some money off an infant while you still can? It's not too late to make an a** out of yourself and claim paternity!

Posted by: bluegray Sun Mar 11, 2007 @ 12:27am

If con is the opposite of pro then what is the opposite of progress?
Help me with my Science Fair Project?
-Proud Atheist-

User Comments: [13] [add]

TickTockMan
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sun Mar 11, 2007 @ 06:49pm


	YAY for Chloe pwning!!! Animal Farm = Cesar sleeping 1983 = One of the best f'n books ever!! Communism = Greatest thing ever!!! Tom Morello is a badass ha HA ha...

Commented on: Wed Mar 21, 2007 @ 09:12pm


	^o^

[-NeeChee-
Community Member

Offline

Numa Xisp
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Thu Mar 22, 2007 @ 03:56am


	COUGH I was informed by a friend that James is not only the father, but has decided to take custody of the child. How this was disclosed to me, will not be revealed because many lives have been lost to bring you this information. The complete irony is that Daniellyn happens to be God’s second son being born from the womb of a virgin mother but from the seed of a virgin father (who did not visit a sperm bank). This leaves one to wonder at how God works with mysterious and sickeningly humoristic ways. The prophecy has also told that Daniellyn will never live up to his big brother’s name but will still lead a life of great fortune, even though it will not be marked in the Newest Testament. [Everyone may purchase their copies of the Newest Testament in the year 696 MAD {Morte Anno Domini}]

Commented on: Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 01:21am


	@Cesar: it's "1984", tonto. mrgreen @James: uh... burning_eyes

bluegray
Community Member

Offline

Numa Xisp
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 06:50am


	Written in 1948 eek Oh snap click click

Commented on: Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 06:30pm


	hides in corner from obsessive snapper "Your point being...?"

bluegray
Community Member

Offline

TickTockMan
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 08:46pm


	lmao jumps off a bridge

Commented on: Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 11:35pm


	Orwell could not think of a title for the novel xd

Numa Xisp
Community Member

Offline

bluegray
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sun Mar 25, 2007 @ 04:08am


	How on earth do you KNOW so much???

Commented on: Sun Mar 25, 2007 @ 05:48pm


	I do not know anything for sure, but I can approximate... xd For instance 1+1=2 but 2+2=4 may not have been proven in a strict mathematical proof. Principia Mathematica (where 1+1=2 is proven) if you are interested to read up about set theory, I forewarn you though it is about 350 pages. As you can see while going thorugh life you listen, read, research, experiment, explore, and simply aquire irrevelant information. So it is not really the fact that I know things it is just that I spend the time to look at things in further detail then most people. Memory might have a little to do with it but I consider it negligible.

Numa Xisp
Community Member

Offline

bluegray
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sat Mar 31, 2007 @ 07:44pm


	Um...I don't quite follow you. I have one banana, and you give me a banana. (btw: i hate bananas). then, i have two bananas. right?

Commented on: Sun Apr 01, 2007 @ 12:59am


	The proof of one plus one equals two is dealt within set theory. If you take a very basic approach then you can state that 2+2=4. If you want a complex model you have to make a more rigorous proof. As I have said before I am not sure if there is a rigorous proof for 2+2=4. On your banana theory, a few questions: Looking from a rigorous definition A.) Do your bananas have the same chemical composition down to each particle. B.) Are those chemicals in the exact same space (assuming translation of points). Meaning if you superimpose the bananas their molecules will exactly aline. (Theoretically impossible because matter should not be able to take up the same space) C.) Do those bananas have the exact same mass, volume, etc. (properties)? E.) Are you considering the relativistic effects on the bananas from other objects? F.) ETC.... Conclusion: You probably should have picked something easier to compare because objects that are undergoing change are difficult models. From a practical stand point I can safely state that almost 100% of the time those two bananas will not be the same, simply on the basis of probability. These requirements cannot be practically filled therefore: Your banana plus my banana cannot equal each other. Looking from a simplistic definition: A.) Do they taste and smell the same? B.) Are they about the same size and weight? C.) Are they both the same color? Conclusion: These requirements are easily filled therefore: Your banana plus my banana can equal each other.

Numa Xisp
Community Member

Offline

bluegray
Community Member

Offline

Commented on: Sun Apr 08, 2007 @ 04:31am


	scream Fine. I have two IDENTICAL SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLES. They are fused together at the speed of light. The resulting particle will be equal to the two beginning particles. So THERE!

User Comments: [13] [add]

Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

More Information